• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Freedman & Gopalan Solicitors
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
    • Adoption
    • Civil Disputes & Litigation
    • Contesting & Challenging a Will
    • Conveyancing
    • Debt Recovery
    • Divorce & Family Law
    • Employment Law
    • Wills & Estates Planning
  • Team
    • Harry Norman Freedman
    • Mittu Gopalan
    • Nikita Sofronov
    • Maneesha G Zacharias
    • Jasmin Talj
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Affiliations
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Family Court merges with Federal Circuit Court: What it does it mean?

February 24, 2021 By Fredman & Gopalan Solicitors

A bill to merge the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court was approved in the Senate last week. The decision has proven controversial, with many stakeholders, including retired judges, opposing the merger as a ‘band-aid’ solution that will prejudice family law matters to unspecialised judgment and even longer delays.

What is (or was) the Family Law Court of Australia?

The Family Law Court of Australia was established in 1976 under Chapter 3 of the Australian Constitution by the Family Law Act 1975. Although it was infamously bombed in 1988, the creation of the Family Law Court was generally viewed as a landmark in not only the Australian justice system, but worldwide. The Family Law Court was significant because it highlighted the need for specialist legal attention in circumstances that are often confronting, complex and deeply emotional for parties.

Why merge the two courts?

It might be argued that merging the Family Law Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia will streamline resources that would otherwise be spread between two Courts. Alternatively, it could be argued that by combining the Courts into one broader jurisdiction, more urgent matters involving immigration will take priority. This may have a reverse-effect on making the Court system efficient, pushing matters that are ‘less urgent’ down an ever-expanding list.

A shift into a single Court might, however, take some pressure off Family Court judges, who have been reported as dealing with up to 600 cases on their dockets at one time. However, there is criticism that whilst judges might not be as far spread between cases, family law matters are at risk of being handed to judges that lack specialist experience in negotiating intricate areas of family law. There are arguments being made that a new unified Court will provide some passage of relief to rural, regional and remote communities that were previously unable to access the Family Court at all.

The safety of vulnerable people should always be a priority when making legislative changes to Family Law legal processes in Australia. Arbitration and mediation processes present cost-effective and efficient alternatives to attending Court that may help to reduce some of the volume moving through the new system in the future.

If you would like to discuss anything further with our experts at Freedman & Gopalan Solicitors, call us on 02 8999 9837.

Filed Under: Informational Tagged With: Australian law, controversial, debate, domestic violence, family court, family law, federal circuit court, government, legislation, policy

Primary Sidebar

Our first half hour consultation is free!
Available 24/7!
Call Us Today 02 8917 8700

Get In Touch

Best time to contact you: (required)
WeekdaysAfter hours or weekends

Which area of law is your enquiry related to? (required)

Footer

Freedman & Gopalan Solicitors

We help real people, just like you. Our experience combined with expertise enable us to deliver prompt and efficient legal services to you. We aim to resolve disputes amicably without parties having to litigate; thereby keeping costs to a minimum. We take the worry off our clients.

Our Location

Contact Us

  • Level 6/60 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000
  • 02 8917 8700
  • 02 8917 8799
  • reception@freedmangopalan.com.au

Copyright © 2020 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in