Going into work experience, I was naturally nervous and had little knowledge on how a law firm was run and what a workplace environment in the law field was really like. However, after my experience at Freedman and Gopalan solicitors, my knowledge was broadened and my perpetual interest in becoming a Lawyer had only grown more prominent.

Throughout my time here, I was able to participate in clerical tasks such as scanning and destroying file contents, archiving files, and printing out documents, which gave me an insight on what a typical day would be like for a solicitor, as they of course wouldn’t have a case to work on every day. I am grateful to have been given the opportunity to work on a chronology of an ongoing case, as although it is just putting events into chronological order, it also broadened my understanding of the career, and was an extremely interesting opportunity for me to look at a real affidavit and understand the importance of different aspects of a case. By the end of my work experience I had also written several articles on current topics which was beneficial for me to gain a more insightful understanding on these issues, as well as being able to work on my report writing skills.

What made my experience at Freedman and Gopalan Solicitors the most enjoyable was the amazing staff who were extremely considerate throughout my time there. From my first day there, I did not feel ashamed to ask any questions from any member of the staff, who were nothing short of accommodating. Jasmin supervised me for the 4 days I was there, and if it weren’t for her welcoming nature, I would have been much more nervous going into work experience. I also had the pleasure of meeting Mittu, and even in our limited interactions due to her understandably busy schedule, her kindness and professionalism shone through. Throughout my time there, I had the privilege of watching the employees doing the job that I wish to do in the future, and their work ethic was truly a reflection of the company’s award-winning reputation.

Ultimately, I thank the employees of Freedman and Gopalan Solicitors for giving me the opportunity to not only get an experience of what it would be like to work in my dream job, but for also providing me with the utmost care and compassion that a company can offer.

If you or someone you know wish to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

What is an ADVO?

An Apprehended Domestic Violence Order, otherwise referred to as an ADVO, is a court order which imposes restrictions on an individual who has displayed abusive behaviour to their domestic relatives. Domestic relationships can include a marriage, intimate relationships, previous relationship, relatives, living in the same house or relationship-based care however for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, an ADVO can apply for your kin or extended family (e.g., grandchildren, grandparents, cousins, aunts, uncles).

In New South Wales there are three types of ADVOs which can be issued:

Advantages of an ADVO

BOSCAR has reported results from various studies which reflected reports from women stating that there were significant mitigations of the numbers of verbal abuse, stalking, threatening phone calls, or other threats of violence, for up to four weeks after the ADVO had been administered. An ADVO does not count on an individual’s criminal record, however, breaching it is considered a criminal offence with up to two years of imprisonment in the state of New South Wales. Even if there is insufficient evidence for an ADVO to be carried out, the submission will still be retained by the police. Further, ADVOs are available online, meaning the victim doesn’t have to wait for a lengthy court process in order to stop their abuser.

Disadvantages of an ADVO

The breach rate of ADVOs in New South Wales is just under 50%, recording a breach of 5% of Provisional Orders, 9% of Interim Orders and 20% of Final ADVOs. There are cases of women who have ordered for an ADVO, and this has failed to stop their attacker, like in the case of Sharon Louise Michelutti, who relied on the protection of ADVOs and yet was stabbed to death by her husband even after multiple ADVOs were taken out on him.

What to do if you get served with an ADVO

You may give an undertaking to the court swearing that you will withhold from committing that action or you can contest the facts of the ADVO or accept the conditions ordered and not the admissions. It is important to remember that an ADVO does not go on your criminal record. Prior to making your decision it is important that you consider facts like if there is sufficient proof for and ADVO to be administered.

If you or someone you know wish to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

Swimmers have been caught at a crossroad regarding the recent debate over transgender athletes competing in women’s events. The International Swimming Federation concluded that the transgender female athletes who have transitioned after the age of 12 will be excluded from competing in female swimming events. Athletic performance is heavily determined by sex, with males out-performing females in almost all categories, including swimming. Many view this policy as discriminatory and offensive, whereas others view it as a scientifically accurate decision, made to benefit cisgender female athletes as well as transgender athletes.

FINA president Husain Al-Musallam said, “We are faced with such a delicate balancing act, we have to protect the rights of all our athletes to compete, but we also have to protect competitive fairness at our events, especially women’s competition and also the past record and achievement of the women.” Al-Musallam announced that swimming will be the first sport to introduce an open category, where anybody regardless of their gender identity can compete at an Olympic level.

Many Olympic swimmers have come forward, announcing their stance on this divisive topic. Olympic champion Cate Campbell publicly voiced her support for the FINA policy. “Believe me, I have wrestled long and hard with myself, with what to say and do. I am aware that my actions and words, no matter what I say, will anger some people — whether they are from the trans-community or from the cisgender female community.” Campbell said in her speech. “However, I am asking everyone to take a breath, to absorb before reacting. Listen to the science and experts.”. Other female Olympic champions like Summer Sanders and Emily Seebohm have voiced their support of the policy, claiming that it is inclusive of transgender individuals by giving them an opportunity to compete in the sport.

Former Australian swimmer Madeline Groves responded to Cate Campbell’s speech on Twitter, chastising her decision to support the discrimination of transgender individuals. “So you ban them from competing with their peers? You’re okay with ostracising an already marginalised group? Real accepting.” Groves tweeted. “Shame on everyone that supported this discriminatory and unscientific decision.”

The International Swimming Federation concluded that transgender female athletes who transitioned before the age of 12 would be excluded from competing in their events due to their biological advantages. However there is already speculation that the policy will be challenged by legal experts around the world due to the discrimination within the conditions of the policy.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss any legal issues, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

When I had my work experience at Freedman and Gopalan Solicitors I was given many different tasks throughout the four days that I was there. Some of the more basic tasks I did were scan and destroy, archiving and delivering packages. These basic but necessary tasks allowed me to understand how to navigate myself properly through an average day at work and get a taste for what my future would be like if I choose this area of work. It also allowed me to get familiar with the technology needed in a job like this. I also worked on writing articles throughout the week. These allowed me to explore interesting current topics and develop my writing skills.

However, my two favourite tasks were completing chronologies and sitting in during a meeting. The chronologies allowed me to see the different factors that are important in a case and how they need to be arranged in order to allow for a simple dissection of everything that occurred. When observing the meeting I got to see where to direct the conversation, what was the necessary information, what steps are meant to be taken when just starting a case and how to deal with these types of potentially emotional situations in a calm and professional manner. Both of these tasks gave me a deeper understanding of the steps that are taken in a working on a case.

I was especially thrilled and lucky to be welcomed by the amazing staff here. I was never afraid to ask any questions and their guidance was very helpful in knowing what to do. I don’t think I would have gotten so much out of the experience if the staff wasn’t as approachable and kind. I was very thankful to have the opportunity to have work experience here and I am grateful for the many skills I learnt throughout the week. This experience has made me even more sure of my path in the future and helped me be less afraid of what my future will look like.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss any legal issues, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

When young workers are trying to fight for their basic work right of being paid, it is sadly a lot harder than it first might seem. The first and most basic problem is their inability to speak up. Some young people are just shy while others are here on a visa and are afraid of jeopardizing their current job.

Another problem is the expensiveness of the process. Since the amount that they are fighting for is not high, even when they win the case, they don’t gain any profits because of the price of the whole process. This is called a pyrrhic victory.

Another downside to the process is the complexity of it. To some people, it can seem hard to understand and is way too much effort for them to undertake. It is also hard when the court orders for the person to be paid but it still goes unpaid, and many people do not know what to do after that.

To help resolve this, Sharmilla Bargon, coordinator of the Employment Rights Legal Service, suggests that the Federal Government should create a small claims tribunal that deals with cases like this in a simple and affordable way. However, for now the best way for young people to deal with this situation is to speak up as soon as they notice any unpaid debts but there is still a long way to go in resolving this issue.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

In Australia we have open adoptions. This means that the child will know they are adopted and be supplied with any necessary information on their family and cultural heritage. They are able to keep their given name or names (while still being able to change their last name to fit with the new families last name if needed), identity, language, cultural and religious ties. These should not be put in jeopardy just for the benefit of the adopting parents as it is the child’s wellbeing that is first priority, and all decisions should be made in order to benefit the child.

Adoption is made at a state level which means that the exact ways that adoption is done will differ. The basic steps for all types of adoption across all different states and territories include getting in touch with the relevant agency/department, attending information sessions, creating the relevant documentation, being assessed and trained, getting placed with a child that suits both the adoptee/s and the child and then getting post adoptive support (sometimes provided by state/territory departments).

Once the child is adopted, they are as equal as a birth child. This means they have the same rights and responsibilities, and they will no longer be under the responsibility of the Minster for Communities and Justice.

In order to adopt a child, you must be a resident in Australia, in the right physical and mental state to take on the responsibility of a child, over 21 years old and at least 18 years older than the child.

Once you understand all of this you can decide what type of adoption will be best for your situation. The main types of adoption are:

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

The following are the main changes that the Labor government have promised.

To make it easier to see doctors and take the pressure off of hospitals by providing Medicare Urgent Care Clinics, boosting workforce incentives for rural and regional GPs, expanding the John Flynn Prevocational Doctor Program, expanding the Innovative Models of Collaborative Care program, and strengthening rural generalist and GP registrar training. They also want to cut costs of medications by reducing the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

To help secure Australian jobs by including 45,000 new places to have fee-free TAFE courses in industries with skills shortages, 20,000 more university placements, give people more access to apprenticeships by having one in ten workers on major government projects be apprentices, increase wages, ensure same job equals same pay, make work more secure, make wage theft a national level crime, maximise the use of Australian-made products and try to close the gender pay gap.

In order to make childcare cheaper they are lifting the maximum childcare subsidy rate, increasing subsidy rates for families with one child who earn less than $530,000, make subsidy rates higher for additional children who are cared for and extend the subsidy rate to outside school hours.

To improve schools, they will deliver $440 million for better ventilation, building upgrades and mental health support through the Schools Upgrade Fund. This will ensure that public schools get the same funding as private schools and are more ready for facing the effects of COVID.

Through their Powering Australia plan, they aim to create 604,000 jobs, cut power bills for families and businesses by $275 through upgrades to the electricity grid to fix energy transmissions which then lowers prices, have an electric car discount, reduce emissions gradually over time so they can get to net zero by 2050 and produce 85 more solar banks throughout Australia.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

It was recently announced that Lincoln Crowley will become a Supreme Court Judge on the 13 June 2022. This is a significant and important moment for Crowley as he gets to represent many other First Nations people and inspire them to ignore the relentless racism they face and continue to fight for what they want.

As a child, there were many unfortunate experiences that he faced in concerns to racism. One example of this is when his deputy principal called him into their office and stated “Your family is Aboriginal aren’t they? They’re the type that end up in jail”. Even as a young person he was constantly told negative things about his Indigenous side but despite that he continued to persevere and become successful.

His position as a Supreme Court Judge in Queensland is well deserved. Since he was a regarded as an expert in his position as a barrister, he was given the title of Queen’s Council in 2018. He was a solicitor-advocate for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service shortly after he graduated school. He also had many high-profile cases including his role as crown prosecutor on a case about Omar Succarieh who was convicted of foreign incursion charges.

It is important that people in high positions represent our community so they can better make decisions that will reflect what Australia wants and stands for. As stated by Annastacia Palaszczuk on the topic of Crowley’s new position it was “hopefully the sign of many more to come”.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

In Australia, couples must be separated for a period greater than twelve months before being granted the ability to file for divorce. In most cases, separation is easy to define – when a couple first begins living separately, however, in some cases, couples choose to remain living in the same house even after separation, in which case it makes it harder to prove that their relationship is beyond the point of repair. This is referred to as separation under one roof.

Separating under one roof is a common choice for couples. There are a wide variety of reasons why this option may seem the most appealing to them. A primary factor is financial reasons, where one spouse may not have enough money to support themselves or buy their own home, especially considering increasing house prices. Many separating couples could also jointly own their hone and not want to give it up. Additionally, many see it as the best option from a parenting perspective, so that they can raise their kids in an easier, more family-like environment.

When investigating whether two people are separated, even if they live together, courts will consider several factors that are indictive of their separation including their financial aspects, social aspects, sleeping arrangements and intimacy levels. Regarding finances, it is recommended that separated couples living together separate their finances. This shows a lack of interdependence in the relationship. This could involve separating joint bank accounts, removing one another as beneficiaries in a will, superannuation, and bill payments. Another indicator is the social aspect in the couple’s lives. This regards whether they still present themselves as a couple to institutions and looks like whether they continue to attend events together, celebrate festivals together and whether they tell their friends and family about their situation. It is also expected that couples that are separated under one roof sleep in separate rooms and are not intimate with one another.

These factors all must be evident in affidavit statements from both parties. This document must show a clear shift in the nature of the relationship by portraying the above requirements.

Separating under one roof remains to be a common option for many newly separated couples, however, can often be hard to prove. It is crucial for spouses to be able to totally prove their financial, social, and intimate separation in such cases.

If you or someone you know wish to to discuss this issue further, then please do not hesitate to contact us on 02 8999 9809.

envelopeprinterphonemap-marker